Takeoff lab Ā· from Tom Davidson’s intelligence-explosion model

How Big Will the Intelligence Explosion Be?

Drag the four parameters of the model. Watch the odds of a software intelligence explosion move — in real time.

Built from Tom Davidson’s thread and the Forethought paper with T. Houlden, ā€œHow quick and big would a software intelligence explosion be?ā€

⚠ TOY ILLUSTRATION OF THE PAPER’S LOGIC — the real model is a Monte Carlo.

Input console — 4 parameters

Ɨ8
Ɨ2ā–² median Ɨ8Ɨ32
1.20
0.4ā–² median 1.23.6
11 yrs
6ā–² median 1116
0.30
0.15ā–² median 0.300.60
ā–¶ What am I playing with?

A software intelligence explosion (SIE) = fully automating AI R&D, with hardware held fixed. Better AI → more effective R&D labour → faster progress → better AI, looping until the effective algorithmic ceiling binds. Davidson and Houlden’s Monte Carlo samples the four parameters above from wide distributions and reports how often the loop compresses years of AI progress into months. This lab compresses that logic into a deterministic toy: same four inputs, same directions, anchored to their headline numbers — ~57% chance ≄3 years of progress lands in ≤1 year, ~41% in ≤4 months, ~18% for ≄10 years in ≤1 year, ~12% in ≤4 months.

For scale: 3 years of AI progress ā‰ˆ 1000Ɨ effective compute — software has historically doubled effective compute roughly every 3 months.

Explosion odds — live

Under your assumptions: 57%
chance that 3 years of AI progress compresses into 1.
≄3 yrs progress in ≤1 yr57%
≄3 yrs progress in ≤4 mo41%
≄10 yrs progress in ≤1 yr18%
≄10 yrs progress in ≤4 mo12%
Anchored: central case reproduces the paper’s ~57 / 41 / 18 / 12. Toy model.